Hernán Cortés: The Man Who Changed Two Worlds and Answered to Neither

Table of Contents

Quick Bio

Detail	Info
Full Name	Hernán Cortés de Monroy y Pizarro Altamirano
Birth Date	1485 (exact date uncertain)
Nationality	Spanish
Main Profession	Conquistador, explorer, colonial governor
Biggest Achievements	Led the Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire between 1519 and 1521; claimed what is now Mexico for the Spanish Crown; founded Mexico City on the ruins of Tenochtitlan
Key Fact 1	He launched his expedition against the direct orders of the colonial governor of Cuba, Diego Velázquez — making him technically a rogue operator for most of the conquest
Key Fact 2	His alliance with the Tlaxcalans and dozens of other Indigenous groups who hated Aztec rule was arguably the decisive factor in the conquest — it wasn’t just Spanish soldiers who brought down the empire
Key Fact 3	Despite conquering one of the most powerful empires in the Western Hemisphere, Cortés spent much of his later life fighting legal battles in Spain and died in relative obscurity

Why He Still Makes People Uncomfortable

Hernán Cortés is one of those historical figures who refuses to fit cleanly into any box you try to put him in. He’s not a simple villain, though he did extraordinarily brutal things. He’s not a hero, though he did accomplish things that were, by any measure, astonishing. He sits in this complicated, contested space that historians and cultures are still arguing about five centuries later.

In Mexico, his legacy is particularly charged. There are very few statues of Cortés in the country he essentially created. His name doesn’t get the kind of official commemoration you might expect for someone so historically central. The wounds of the conquest run deep enough that honoring him publicly feels, to many Mexicans, like celebrating a catastrophe.

In Spain, the view is more complicated and more ambivalent. In the broader world of historical debate, he keeps resurfacing every time someone wants to talk about colonialism, the nature of conquest, the ethics of historical judgment, or the question of what it means when one civilization destroys another.

He matters because what he did changed the world permanently. And because how we think about what he did says a lot about how we think about power, violence, and history itself.

Medellín, Spain, and a Boy With Ambitions Too Big for His Town

Cortés was born around 1485 in Medellín, a small town in the Extremadura region of western Spain. Extremadura is worth knowing about because it produced a disproportionate number of conquistadors — Pizarro came from there too — and there’s probably a reason for that. It was a tough, dry, not particularly wealthy part of Spain. The sons of minor noble families there had good enough birth to feel entitled to something better but not enough money or land to get it at home. The New World, when it opened up, must have looked like the answer to a very specific kind of ambition.

Cortés’s family was minor nobility — what the Spanish called hidalgos. His father, Martín Cortés de Monroy, was a soldier of modest means. The family wasn’t poor, but they weren’t powerful either. Hernán was their only son, and apparently a somewhat sickly child, though he recovered and grew into a physically capable young man.

The world he grew up in was Spain at the peak of its early imperial energy. Columbus had returned from the Caribbean in 1493, when Cortés was around eight years old. The news of new lands to the west was everywhere. The Spanish Crown was consolidating power at home and reaching aggressively outward. For a boy with ambition and limited local prospects, the timing was almost too perfect.

Salamanca, Law School, and a Very Short Attention Span

His parents, recognizing that their son was sharp and needed direction, sent him at fourteen to the University of Salamanca — one of the most prestigious universities in Europe at the time — to study law. This was a genuinely good opportunity, and by most accounts Cortés was intelligent enough to have made something of it.

He lasted two years. He seemed incapable of staying still, restless, and completely disinterested in living his entire life handling legal paperwork in some Spanish provincial office. To his parents’ dismay, he returned to Medellín at the age of sixteen without a degree or a defined goal.

What he did have was an awareness that the Caribbean colonies were where everything was happening. He tried to join an expedition to the New World in 1502 but missed it — there are various accounts of why, ranging from illness to a late-night climbing accident involving a woman’s bedroom wall, which may or may not be true but is very consistent with the person he seems to have been.

He finally made it to Hispaniola — present-day Dominican Republic and Haiti — in 1504, at around nineteen years old. He was given land and enslaved Indigenous laborers under the encomienda system, which was the standard colonial arrangement of the time. For several years he was a reasonably successful colonial settler — farming, raising cattle, slowly accumulating resources and a reputation.

It was a comfortable enough life. It was also completely insufficient for whatever was driving him.

Cuba, Velázquez, and the First Taste of Real Action

In 1511, Cortés joined an expedition to conquer Cuba, led by Diego Velázquez. The Cuba campaign was successful, and Cortés performed well enough that Velázquez took a liking to him — appointing him secretary and eventually making him a prominent figure in the new colonial administration.

Their relationship was close and then complicated. Cortés was charming and capable, but he was also clearly ambitious in ways that made Velázquez nervous. There were disputes, periods of falling out, and at one point Velázquez actually had Cortés arrested over a broken engagement to a woman connected to the governor’s family. Cortés escaped from jail — literally broke out — was recaptured, and eventually resolved the situation by marrying the woman in question, Catalina Suárez. Their marriage was not particularly happy, by most accounts, but it patched things up with Velázquez for a while.

When Velázquez was planning an expedition to explore the Mexican mainland — reports of a massive, wealthy civilization to the west had been coming back from earlier scouting missions — he initially chose Cortés to lead it. Then he got cold feet. Cortés, he’d decided, was too independent, too ambitious, potentially too dangerous to trust with that much authority.

Cortés ignored the cancellation. He gathered his ships, his men, and his supplies, and left Cuba anyway in February 1519. Velázquez was furious. He sent ships after Cortés to stop him. They didn’t catch him in time.

That decision — to go anyway, to simply disregard the authority of the man who had appointed him — is either the most audacious act of military entrepreneurship in history or a breathtaking act of insubordination, depending on your perspective. Probably both.

Mexico, the Tlaxcalans, and How the Aztec Empire Actually Fell

The story of the conquest is often told as if a few hundred Spanish soldiers with horses and guns simply overwhelmed a vast empire through technological superiority. That’s not really what happened.

When Cortés landed on the Mexican coast in 1519 with around 500 soldiers, he was entering a political landscape of enormous complexity. The Aztec Empire — centered on the spectacular island city of Tenochtitlan, in the middle of what is now Mexico City — was powerful but also deeply resented by the many peoples it had conquered and taxed and taken captive for human sacrifice. There were millions of people across central Mexico who had very good reasons to want the Aztec ruling class gone.

Cortés figured this out relatively quickly, partly through an extraordinary piece of luck: he acquired a translator named Malintzin — often called La Malinche — a Nahua-speaking woman who had also learned Maya, and who became essential to his ability to communicate, negotiate, and understand the political terrain. Her role in the conquest is as contested as Cortés’s own — hero, traitor, victim, survivor, depending on who you ask and when.

The Tlaxcalans were the turning point. They were a fiercely independent people who had resisted Aztec domination for generations. When Cortés arrived, they initially fought against him — hard enough that his army came close to being destroyed. But then, in one of history’s more consequential diplomatic pivots, Cortés negotiated an alliance with them. The Tlaxcalans decided that the Spanish were potentially useful against their Aztec enemies, and threw their considerable military resources behind the expedition.

By the time Cortés marched on Tenochtitlan, he had tens of thousands of Indigenous allies alongside his Spanish forces. That’s the army that brought down the Aztec Empire. The Spanish provided leadership, horses, some firearms, and the critical element of smallpox — which spread devastatingly through populations with no immunity — but the actual military coalition was overwhelmingly Indigenous.

Cortés entered Tenochtitlan in November 1519 and was received by the Aztec emperor Huayna Cuitláhuac — wait, by Moctezuma II — with a combination of ceremony and wariness. What followed was months of uneasy coexistence, political maneuvering, and then open conflict. The Spanish were driven out of the city in a catastrophic defeat in June 1520 — the Noche Triste, the Night of Sorrows — losing hundreds of men and nearly losing Cortés himself.

He regrouped, reinforced, and came back. The siege of Tenochtitlan lasted months and ended in August 1521 with the city destroyed and the Aztec Empire finished. It was one of the most consequential military campaigns in human history, achieved through a combination of brutality, strategic brilliance, epidemic disease, and alliances with people who had their own reasons to want the empire gone.

Governor, Explorer, and a Man the Spanish Crown Never Quite Trusted

After the conquest, Cortés was appointed Governor and Captain-General of New Spain — the vast territory that became Mexico and beyond. He founded Mexico City on the ruins of Tenochtitlan, organized colonial administration, sent expeditions in every direction, and began the enormous process of building a new colonial society on the wreckage of the one he’d destroyed.

He was good at administration in some ways and careless in others. He was generous with allies and brutal with enemies. He sent letters back to the Spanish Crown — the famous Cartas de Relación — that are remarkable documents, partly because they’re clearly self-serving accounts designed to justify his unauthorized actions, and partly because they contain genuinely vivid, detailed descriptions of the world he was navigating.

The Spanish Crown rewarded him with titles and land but never quite trusted him with full political authority. He was eventually superseded by a formal viceroy, Antonio de Mendoza, in 1535, which effectively ended his power in New Spain.

He led one more major expedition — to Baja California in the 1530s — which was expensive, difficult, and not particularly successful. He spent money he didn’t have, explored territory that didn’t pan out, and came back with less than he’d hoped for.

The Personal Life, Which Was Complicated

Cortés had children scattered across multiple relationships. His wife Catalina joined him in Mexico in 1522 and died shortly after arriving, under circumstances that were suspicious enough to generate rumors of murder that followed Cortés for years. Although he was looked into, he was never prosecuted.

His son with Malintzin, María Cortés, is frequently referred to as one of the earliest mestizo offspring, a representation of the biological and cultural blending that defined colonial Mexico. He later had legitimate children through his second marriage to Juana de Zúñiga, a Spanish noblewoman.

He had multiple children through various other relationships, acknowledged some and not others, and seemed to approach fatherhood with the same pragmatic inconsistency he brought to most things.

The Fall and the Long Diminishment

The last two decades of Cortés’s life were, by any measure, a significant comedown from his earlier trajectory. He spent years in Spain fighting legal battles over his titles, his lands, his authority, his reputation. He was wealthy — he had received enormous land grants and had interests in various colonial enterprises — but he was perpetually tangled in litigation and political maneuvering.

He tried repeatedly to get the Spanish Crown to give him a major command, to let him lead another conquest or expedition. He was mostly ignored or given vague encouragement that led nowhere. He joined a disastrous Spanish naval expedition against Algiers in 1541, which accomplished nothing and during which he was barely noticed.

He died in December 1547, near Seville, at around sixty-two years old. He had been planning to return to Mexico but never made it. He was wealthy enough at death but not the towering figure he’d been at his peak. His remains were moved multiple times over the centuries — a strange, somewhat undignified posthumous journey that seems fitting for someone whose legacy has never quite settled.

What He Was Worth, and What That Even Means

At his peak, Cortés was one of the wealthiest men in the Spanish colonial world. He controlled vast encomiendas — grants of Indigenous labor — across Mexico, owned mines, had agricultural estates, and had significant claims on colonial revenues. In today’s terms, the wealth he commanded at his height would be difficult to even calculate — it included the labor of thousands of people and the resources of an entire region.

By his death, significant portions of that wealth had been eaten up by legal battles, failed expeditions, and the general cost of maintaining a grandee’s lifestyle while fighting constant political battles. He left an estate that was substantial but not staggering, and his heirs spent years fighting over and defending what remained.

There is, obviously, no “current net worth” — he died in 1547. It’s important to remember that the wealth he amassed was always more brittle than it appeared, reliant on the legal standing and royal favor he had in his later years. fighting to maintain.

Final Words

Hernán Cortés is the kind of person who makes you confront the question of whether historical greatness and historical horror can live in the same body. The answer, uncomfortably, is yes. What he accomplished was extraordinary by any military or strategic measure. What it cost — in human lives, in civilizations destroyed, in a way of life erased — is almost impossible to fully reckon with.

He was audacious, adaptable, ruthless, occasionally generous, politically shrewd, and personally reckless. He changed the world more completely than almost anyone who has ever lived. He also helped set in motion one of the great catastrophes in human history.

Neither of those things cancels the other out. Both have to stay in the room.

That’s what makes him one of history’s most important and most uncomfortable figures — and why, five hundred years later, we’re still having the argument about what he was and what he means.

FAQs

1. Did Cortés really burn his ships to prevent his men from retreating?

The story is more complicated than the famous version. He scuttled — rendered unseaworthy — most of his ships, rather than dramatically burning them. The purpose was similar though: removing the option of retreat and committing his men to the expedition. It was a real event, just less cinematically fiery than the legend.

2. Who was La Malinche and why is she controversial?

Malintzin, known as La Malinche or Doña Marina, was a Nahua woman who became Cortés’s translator and advisor, and the mother of his son Martín. In Mexico she’s a deeply contested figure — seen by some as a traitor who helped the Spanish destroy Indigenous civilization, and by others as a survivor and agent making the best of impossible circumstances. The word “malinchista” in Mexican Spanish still means someone who betrays their own culture for foreign influence.

3. How many Spanish soldiers did Cortés actually have?

His initial force numbered around 500 soldiers, plus horses, dogs, and some artillery. This is a small number to conquer an empire of millions — which is why the story only makes sense when you understand the tens of thousands of Indigenous allies who joined the campaign, particularly the Tlaxcalans.

4. What was Tenochtitlan actually like?

By all accounts — Spanish and Indigenous — it was a genuinely spectacular city. Built on an island in a lake, connected by causeways to the mainland, with a population of perhaps 200,000 to 300,000 people, it was larger than any city in Spain at the time. The Spanish who saw it for the first time compared it to cities from legend.

5. Did Cortés murder his wife Catalina?

He was investigated for her death — she died suddenly in 1522, and witnesses reported she had marks on her neck — but he was never convicted of anything. Historians remain divided. Some think she died of asthma or another medical cause; others think the circumstances were genuinely suspicious. It remains unresolved.

6. What happened to the Aztec emperor Moctezuma?

Moctezuma II died during the Spanish presence in Tenochtitlan, and exactly how is disputed. The Spanish said he was killed by his own people when he attempted to address the crowd on their behalf. Indigenous accounts generally say the Spanish killed him. His death remains one of the great unresolved questions of the conquest.

7. How did smallpox affect the conquest?

Devastatingly. Smallpox arrived in Mexico ahead of Cortés’s final siege, killing enormous numbers of people including the successor to Moctezuma. Indigenous populations had no immunity to European diseases, and the epidemics that followed contact killed far more people than Spanish soldiers ever did — some estimates suggest population losses of fifty to ninety percent in the decades following the conquest.

8. Why didn’t the Spanish Crown fully trust Cortés?

Partly because he had launched his expedition illegally, against the orders of the governor of Cuba. A man who ignores orders when it suits him is useful but difficult to control. The Crown rewarded his results but was never comfortable giving him unchecked authority over such a valuable territory.

9. What were the Letters of Relation?

The Cartas de Relación were five letters Cortés wrote to the Spanish king Charles I (also Holy Roman Emperor Charles V) describing his expedition and the lands he was conquering. They’re remarkable historical documents — part military report, part self-justification, part ethnographic description — and they remain primary sources for historians of the conquest.

10. What did Cortés do after the conquest of Mexico?

He governed New Spain for a period, sent expeditions to explore Central America and what is now California, and eventually returned to Spain to fight legal and political battles over his status and holdings. He never received another major command and spent his final years in frustration and relative marginalization.

11. Where is Cortés buried?

His remains have been moved multiple times and their current location — in a church in Mexico City — was kept deliberately quiet for many years because of fears that the tomb might be vandalized given the hostility toward his legacy in Mexico.

12. How is Cortés viewed in Mexico today compared to Spain?

In Mexico, he is generally viewed negatively — associated with colonialism, destruction, and the violent erasure of Indigenous civilization. There are almost no public statues or official commemorations. In Spain, the view is more ambivalent — he’s a historical figure of acknowledged importance, but not a straightforward national hero. In both countries, the conversation about his legacy has become more nuanced and more contested in recent decades.

Read stories that climb higher than expectation with The Madrid Magazine.